Indonesia, Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction

Indonesia is a country that is highly prone to hazards due to its geographical position. Indonesia poses potential hazards of floods, land mass movement, windstorms, drought, forest and land fires, and diseases and epidemics. Recently the global climate change has also started to have impacts on many areas in the archipelago. Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of climate-related hazards, increased the vulnerability of the poor, and decreased the capacity of many in dealing with hazardous events. It has influences over critical sectors like health, water, food, livelihood, education and infrastructure.


National Progress
In responding to need of DRR and CCA, in term of policy and regulatory,  Indonesia had demonstrated its commitment to international instruments and results of various summits since the Earth Summit in 1992. In compliance with the Hyogo Framework for Action, Indonesia had passed Law No. 24/2007 on Disaster Management. Indonesia also enacted Law No. 6/1994 on the ratification of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Law No. 17/2004 on the Ratification of Kyoto Protocol (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change).

Indonesia also issued Presidential Decree No. 61/2011 on National Action Plan for Greenhouse Gases Reduction and Presidential Decree No. 71/2011 on the Conduct of National Greenhouse Gases Inventory. The National Middle-term Development Plan had also put disaster risk reduction and climate change as one priority program under environmental management and disaster management.

With regards to institutional arrangement, Indonesia had established the National DM Agency and Local DM Agencies (BPBD) in all provinces and nearly all district cities to coordinate the conduct of disaster management and risk reduction all over the country.

For climate change, the government had also set-up the National Council for Climate Change (DNPI), a body tasked to prepare Indonesian strategies in climate change mitigation and adaptation, among others through leadership in negotiation process in climate conference rounds. DNPI also coordinated sectoral agencies in formulating strategies and approach in facing climate change, but it did not have the mandate to plan and coordinate development programs that address climate change at the national and local level.


Lack of Local Capacity
Despite the country’s commitment to the two issues, DRR and CCA practitioners had long observed that local governments faced grave constraints in translating the commitment into development programs and activities. Some considered this as attributable to the absence of robust umbrella laws and regulations, deficiency in programming, and limited budget available for such programs. The issues of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation are new to most communities, governments and civil society organizations alike. Implementation of DRR and CCA-related programs and activities has still been viewed as two distinct and separate issues.

At present, local practices in DRR-CCA had begun to be adopted in Strategic Plans of relevant local government offices or Middle-term Development Plans of local or village governments, as could be seen in Merapi and Manokwari cases. Although not in all regions, Policies at the provincial and local levels were more or less responsive to the national development plan, as could be seen in the establishment of local DM Agencies and Local Task Force for Climate Change, as well as the formulation of Local Disaster Management Plans or Local Action Plans for Disaster Risk Reduction and Local Action Plan for Greenhouse Gases Reduction. Constraints were still faced, however, in the implementation of DRR and CCA programs, both at the provincial and district/city levels, where sectoral approach was mostly took precedence.

DRR-CCA Integration
Disaster management may not be conducted in the old conventional way, instead it has to be designed with a longer-term perspective and integrated into the national development. In other words, Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation need to be mainstreamed into development agenda both at the national and local levels.

The integration of CCA-DRR into development agenda may contribute to more cost-effective and efficient development. Nonetheless, an effective approach to integrate DRR and CCA into development has yet to be formulated.



Submitted to CIFAL Jeju, Korea for International Conference on Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) in the Asia-Pacific Region” on 18-21 April 2016.

No comments:

Post a Comment